Election 2014: Heed the message |

Election 2014: Heed the message

In what turned out to be an old-fashioned midterm Election Day thumping, the national Democratic Party of “Yes we can!” — despite the disaster of ObamaCare, putrid economics and badly fumbled foreign policies — ran headfirst into a thoroughly disgusted electorate that signaled clearly and conclusively, “No you can’t!”

The numbers couldn’t be more convincing: The GOP will claim at least 246 House seats, its largest majority since World War II, according to a CNN projection. And Republicans have won their Senate prize, taking at least 52 seats. Collectively, it could be the most dominant Republican Congress since 1929, The Washington Post projects.

“For too long, this administration has tried to tell the American people what is good for them and then blame somebody else when their policies didn’t work out,” said Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., who won a sixth term and is expected to become the Senate’s next majority leader.

Clearly Americans have demanded a course correction from the unrelenting string of federal disasters, from the half-baked rollout of the health care exchanges, to the bungled Ebola response and (closer to home) the profound failures of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

For weeks to come, analysis from politicos and armchair pundits will fill the airwaves and op-ed pages. But come 2015, the work begins for the new GOP majorities in the House and Senate. The course they set must instill public confidence instead of today’s contempt for all things Washington.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.