Archive

ShareThis Page
Former S.C.I. Greensburg plans raise questions | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Former S.C.I. Greensburg plans raise questions

GTRvetcenter007032318
Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
Plans to create the Greensburg Veterans Sunrise Center, through development of the former SCI Greensburg, in Hempfield Township, begin with the removal of the fencing and window bars, as seen on Thursday, March 22, 2018.

A plan to turn the former State Correctional Institute-Greensburg prison into a full-service campus for veterans merits close attention by the Hempfield supervisors.

As Hempfield Supervisor Rob Ritson notes, the 96-acre site off Route 119 could be a commercial benefit because of its size and access to the Pennsylvania Turnpike and Interstate 70.

That’s not to mention the hundreds of veterans from all over the region that the people behind the project, dubbed the Greensburg Veterans Sunrise Center, would be helping.

The sales pitch has a great ring to it: “We’re going to transform it from a place of incarceration to one of liberation where veterans will be able to get back on their feet and return to society,” says project director Robert Wright.

Pretty much everything about the project is ambitious.

There’s the $100 million-plus in private money projected to be spent to convert 10 buildings into a “comprehensive veterans’ transition center,” developers have said. That includes transitional housing for 200 to 300 veterans and health care and job-training facilities.

A Florida-based nonprofit that breeds, trains and donates service dogs to veterans is negotiating to acquire 8 acres on the site to build a kennel.

Plans also call for a hydroponic greenhouse to be built on-site that another company of David Goldsmith’s, the Carlisle businessman behind the project, would use to grow and sell duckweed — a high-protein aquatic plant.

Goldsmith’s Verdant Holdings LLC is gearing up for construction set for the fall. Yet the company went before the township zoning hearing board last month to allow for a change to secure a “major” medical partner necessary to move forward that they did not have.

We also wonder whether the state and the federal Department of Veterans Affairs will sign onto it.

The township supervisors want to see the company’s final site plan, which is expected to be submitted soon.

Ritson rightfully notes that the plan sounds very good. But he’s also correct when he says, “The devil is in the details, and we haven’t seen the details yet.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.