ShareThis Page
Greensburg Laurels & Lances |

Greensburg Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, October 18, 2012 8:52 p.m

Lance: To the era of infallible commissioners. Back in 2003, when Westmoreland County’s Democrat majority insisted on borrowing $10 million for the juvenile detention center, any suggestion challenging that reasoning was met with ridicule. The money was approved, but the project collected dust until recent years, when Dem commissioners pared down the upgrade to $5 million. This month, the center’s “population” dropped to just one juvenile. From the get-go, this was a boondoggle.

Laurel: To Monessen officials. A $478.20 parking fund discrepancy wasn’t going to break the city. But it was enough to trigger questions and subsequent theft charges against Monessen’s longtime former treasurer, Frank “Bucky” Rizzuto Sr. That’s called protecting the public’s dime(s).

Lance: To another “helpful” state law. Had Jeannette kept up with its employee pension payments in the past, its obligation this year reportedly would be $250,000 instead of $630,000. But a 2009 state law cut municipalities some slack on their obligation. Cans kicked down the road have an expensive habit of kicking back.

Categories: Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.