ShareThis Page
Greensburg Tuesday takes |

Greensburg Tuesday takes

| Monday, February 8, 2016 9:00 p.m

Disciplinary vacations?: The figure is troubling: $23,000 paid over two years to Westmoreland County employees suspended without pay who were cleared of wrongdoing. Over that period, 17 who were cleared were paid for 161 days off. At issue is a question of proper management. Closer attention should be focused on the types of inappropriate behavior that trigger a suspension (theft of public money, for example). But county managers must make sure they have reasonable cause before suspending an employee. Poor performers shouldn’t be rewarded with paid time off.

Synchronicity: Finally, the traffic signals on Route 22 between Monroeville and Murrysville will be coordinated at 18 intersections. Traffic-light synchronization is commonplace in other locales. Now that signals will be in sync through this oftentimes busy corridor, here’s hoping motorist will watch their speed and not race to reach the next green light.

Stepping up: There’s no dust collecting on Greensburg police as they adjust to personnel changes — officer vacancies — and now the retirement of Chief Walter J. “Wally” Lyons. That means the officers, starting with Capt. Chad Zucco, who’s been handling most of the chief’s duties, have had more on their plates than usual. But everyone is “stepping up,” we’re told. And that’s exactly as it should be.

Categories: Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.