ShareThis Page
Greensburg Tuesday takes |

Greensburg Tuesday takes

| Monday, January 20, 2014 9:00 p.m

Coming up short: Taxing authorities in Hempfield stand to lose several thousand dollars in collections from three companies that are disputing their tax assessments. The companies say their property tax bills lack uniformity, are unreasonable and discriminatory. And they’re not exactly baseless claims, considering Westmoreland County’s last property reassessment dates to 1972. How much money are local municipalities and school districts losing as a result of unequal assessments? More to the point, how much longer can the county put off an inevitable reassessment?

Dangerous horseplay: Tyler Fetter, 18, of Manor, is lucky to be alive after he and Colton Cline, 19, of Penn Township, were reportedly “goofing around” with a shotgun that discharged. Unfortunately the same episode unfolds with disturbing frequency, occasionally with tragic results, because some people neglect two of the most important rules of gun handling: Never point a firearm at something or someone you don’t intend to shoot and always assume the firearm is loaded.

Responsible pet owners: Westmoreland County expects a 20 percent to 30 percent increase in dog licenses this year, due in no small measure to a new system that allows residents to purchase licenses online. And licensing (which is the law) oftentimes is key in finding lost dogs. Kudos to courthouse officials for bringing dog licensing and other public services into the modern era.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.