Archive

ShareThis Page
Greensburg Tuesday takes | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Greensburg Tuesday takes

Tribune-Review
| Monday, November 24, 2014 9:00 p.m

Bond blunder: It sure wasn’t business as usual that jacked up the monthly rates of the Unity Township Municipal Authority for residential customers from about $39 to $50. Turns out previous board members agreed to a “swaption agreement” on $34 million in bonds, with interest rates comparable to a variable-rate mortgage. So the authority now says 75 percent of the increase in customers’ bills will cover the cost of the bond refinancing. A bucket of tar and feathers, please, for the person who inked the original deal.

Firefighters’ alarm: The dwindling roster of the Greensburg Volunteer Fire Department offers a snapshot of what’s happening statewide. In just three years, membership has declined from 327 firefighters to 287. The median age is now 62. Statewide, Pennsylvania’s firefighters have dropped from 300,000 in 1976 to about 50,000 today. “Volunteerism is going down the sewer,” says one longtime volunteer. Yet the state and local communities today are no closer to putting out this burning issue, which has been smouldering for years.

Budget fudging: So-called “overinflated” revenue projections in the 2014 budget has left Fayette County commissioners with a $500,000 “discrepancy.” In just one instance, the fee-based United Parcel Identification System for property records was projected to bring in $450,000; the fund to date has $79,000. That’s not budgeting. It’s wishful thinking in a cash-strapped county that can’t afford it.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.