ObamaCare’s future: Condition critical |

ObamaCare’s future: Condition critical

Just around the time that Barack Obama packs his bags and leaves the White House, the house of cards that is ObamaCare could come tumbling down.

The fourth sign-up period ends just before the presidential inauguration and the numbers are not good, analysts say. Of considerable concern is the continuing struggle to attract young, healthy people to offset the medical costs of older patients.

The 11 million people who bought coverage through the ObamaCare exchanges last year are a far cry from the 21 million projected by the Congressional Budget Office, The Hill newspaper reports.

Meanwhile the nation’s top five insurers all report they’re losing money on the exchanges as they get their first “full look” at ObamaCare’s customer data. UnitedHealth Group responded by scaling back its ObamaCare public exchange offerings.

Not that ObamaCare has been a grand bargain for the public, either. The average premium increase for 2017 is about 9 percent, according to one analysis. In Texas, Blue Cross Blue Shield has proposed a nearly 60 percent increase.

“From a policy point of view, we’re basically seeing the exchanges unravel,” says Michael Abrams, a health care strategist.

Suggested fixes — from increasing ObamaCare subsidies to giving families a $5,000 tax credit — address the symptoms, not the disease. The question is, how much longer will the next president allow this disease to metastasize?

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.