Obama’s Cuba deal: More appeasement |

Obama’s Cuba deal: More appeasement

President Barack Obama, the most deferential and, thus, most dangerous foreign policy president in modern American history, embarked Wednesday on another reckless path: “normalizing” relations with the despotic nation of Cuba, a state sponsor of terrorism.

First leaked was word of a prisoner swap — a wrongly imprisoned U.S. contractor held hostage for five years for three Cuban spies convicted for their direct role in the deaths of Americans and jailed for the past 15 years. That, and the release of a Cuban who spied for America, supposedly was the sugar designed to help the poison mislabeled as medicine go down — a breathtakingly expansive program of appeasement and financial goodies that will give thugs hard cash to prop up the tyrannical Communist state to further ply its ugly trade.

“The exchange of an aid worker for hardened Cuban spies sets a terrible precedent,” Cuban native and former foreign correspondent Mike Gonzalez told us shortly after the deal went public. “Legally and morally, the equivalence is not there.”

Mr. Gonzalez, now a scholar at The Heritage Foundation, says “the swap increases risks for Americans” by sending “the message that you can strong-arm the administration by taking Americans hostage.” And receive all manner of financial and political rewards in return.

Congress must act to thwart such rank appeasement. And it can do so, Gonzalez says, by maintaining the embargo that Obama seeks to dilute — but only it can lift — and snapping shut the purse for any and all diplomatic entreaties.

Barack Obama’s reckless action cannot be allowed to stand. For surely it will further contribute to America’s continuing Obama-fueled fall.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.