Archive

ShareThis Page
Operation Santa Claus: No better bargain | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Operation Santa Claus: No better bargain

Tribune-Review
| Thursday, November 27, 2014 8:55 p.m

At a time when retailers advertise some of their biggest bargains of the year, there’s one truly remarkable deal that’s tough to beat: $17.25 for a traditional Christmas dinner that will feed a family of four.

That’s how far your donated dollars go through Trib Total Media’s Operation Santa Claus. Since 1984, the all-volunteer program, in conjunction with Shop ‘n Save and the Salvation Army, has spread holiday cheer by providing dinners to more than 7,000 needy Southwestern Pennsylvania families across five counties. Children will receive coloring books, crayons and new or gently used storybooks as well.

All money donated by individuals, families and businesses goes directly toward purchasing groceries. Fundraising began earlier this year with Operation Santa Claus’ inaugural Soup for a Claus event, which served up savory soups for nearly 300 ticket buyers in downtown Greensburg. This year’s overall campaign goal is $120,000.

Just fill out the coupon that appears daily in the Trib to make a tax-deductible contribution. Or you can make a donation on behalf of a recipient on your gift list. Either way, each dollar donated will buy more food than shoppers could purchase on their own.

What drives this sleigh o’plenty is neighbors helping neighbors in what’s become a local holiday tradition — one that feeds the Christmas spirit of donors and recipients alike. During this season of giving, there’s no better bargain.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.