ShareThis Page
Our energy boom: Export bonsuses |

Our energy boom: Export bonsuses

| Tuesday, December 2, 2014 9:00 p.m.

Repealing America’s 1970s-era ban on oil exports is what its shale oil industry needs to continue thriving amid depressed global oil prices — and what U.S. consumers need for lower gasoline prices to continue.

A change in gasoline’s global pricing negates the old notion that sending more U.S. oil overseas would raise domestic pump prices, The Washington Times explains. Before 2010, U.S. gasoline prices were linked to the New York Mercantile Exchange’s “West Texas Intermediate” (“WTI”) oil price. That price has been lower in recent years than the Intercontinental Exchange’s “Brent” oil price, to which U.S. gasoline prices have been linked since 2010 in a market globalized by U.S., Saudi and other gasoline exports.

Repealing the U.S. oil export ban would allow U.S. shale oil producers to sell at higher “Brent” prices overseas, instead of at lower “WTI” prices to glutted domestic refineries. And adding U.S. exports to global supply also would lower oil’s global “Brent” price — and, thereby, what Americans pay for gasoline.

That’s what General Accountability Office and private studies have found. It’s what an upcoming Energy Information Administration report is expected to find, too. The benefits for America’s shale industry, consumers and the overall economy make repealing the export ban a no-brainer — and the opposition of too many congressional Democrats an outmoded relic.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.