Archive

ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania Republicans: The path ahead | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Pennsylvania Republicans: The path ahead

If we are to believe the preponderance of the polling, Democrat businessman Tom Wolf of York will roll to an easy victory over Republican incumbent Tom Corbett of Shaler in Pennsylvania’s gubernatorial election two months from today. But stranger things have happened and much can happen over the next 60 days.

That said, should Mr. Corbett be defeated, Republicans controlling the state Legislature had better watch their political backsides. For rank-and-file Republicans have had it up to here (cue the photo of the hand leveled between the nose and the eyes) with a GOP majority that continually mocks commonsense reforms that would best serve the people in favor of the status quo that serves special interests and legislators’ self-preservation.

As John Fund, national affairs correspondent for National Review Online, sees it:

“The challenge Pennsylvania conservatives will face after Gov. Corbett’s likely loss is how to deal with an anti-reform Legislature that is apt to remain under GOP control thanks to creative gerrymandering. In the past, too many conservatives have cut them slack and allowed the party to retain quiet insider control in Harrisburg. But Corbett’s loss would be a wake-up call that the status quo is dragging Pennsylvania’s economy down and alienating the Republican Party’s base.”

Republican legislators, consider yourselves warned.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.