ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances |

Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, March 31, 2016 8:55 p.m

Laurel: To David Cashman. The Allegheny County judge wisely accepted a plea deal that will send former Plum High School teacher Jason Cooper to jail for 18 to 36 months for having sex with a grieving student he had befriended. Mr. Cooper, 39, could have been sentenced to 11 to 22 years in prison. But Judge Cashman said he wanted to spare the victim, 18 at the time of the crime, and her family the pain of going through a trial. That was the family’s desire. Justice in this case was just and compassionate.

Lance: To the federal government. It has taken, thus far, 13 years and spent, thus far, $17 million to study how to repair three dilapidated locks and dams on the Ohio River. And the Emsworth, Dashields and Montgomery facilities and river commerce suffer. We cannot imagine such nonsense happening in the private sector; surely those responsible would have been fired long ago and the broken process overhauled. But, then again, this is government.

On the “Watch List”: Opening day. Sunday’s weather — in the 40s but with a wind chill in the 30s — is shaping up to be more conducive to football than baseball. But that shouldn’t dampen the spirits of those planning to attend Major League Baseball’s 2016 season opener between the Pittsburgh Pirates and the St. Louis Cardinals at PNC Park. Just throw on a few extra layers of clothes under that black-and-gold attire, gargle with hot chocolate, coffee or tea and everyone will be good to go. And let’s go Bucs!

Categories: Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.