Archive

ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances

Tribune-Review
| Thursday, November 20, 2014 8:55 p.m

Ready, set, shop!: It’s Light Up Night in Pittsburgh, the traditional beginning of the Christmas shopping season. All of the city is decked out in the proverbial boughs of holly, the fa-la-la-la-las will be flowing freely and there will be lights, lights, lights! It truly is the most wonderful time of the year. That said, as this most festive season arrives, please do not forget your favorite charities, which do so much to help the less fortunate all through the year, but particularly at Christmastime.

Lance: To Rich Fitzgerald. In the aftermath of a county car scandal that cost him nearly $43,000, Allegheny County’s chief executive now wants to weaken existing rules to allow those with take-home privileges to use such cars for small personal errands. Nothing like creating a brand-new slippery slope. How long will it take for stopping for a gallon of milk on the way home to become a full-fledged trip to the grocery store or to the mall?

An observation: The much ballyhooed Allegheny Central project on Pittsburgh’s North Side, centered around the old Garden Theater adult movie house seized by the government, continues to languish. A number of prospective developers have come and gone; the city’s Urban Redevelopment Authority is expected to choose yet another developer next month. But the common denominator in this failure is government and its attempt to centrally plan. Why is this such a perennially difficult lesson to learn?

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.