ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh Tuesday takes |

Pittsburgh Tuesday takes

| Monday, May 18, 2015 9:00 p.m

Be adults: A Sto-Rox teacher’s aide has been charged with having sex with a 13-year-old girl. Matthew R. Bertovich, 24, of Robinson, allegedly met the child through a “special needs” class. This alleged incident is the latest in a disturbing trend of educators being charged with such behavior. What to do? Acting like adults would be a good place to start.

A princely salary: The median household income for Pittsburghers is $51,291 (based on 2013 data, the last available). But the Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority will pay its new executive director more than four-and-half times that ($240,000). The authority defends James L. Good’s big payday as being the going market rate. So much for public service being a “sacrifice.”

Take down those signs: Candidates seeking their respective parties’ nominations in today’s primary election took great care to strategically place their political signs to garner maximum exposure. Unfortunately, too many candidates won’t make the same effort to remove those signs after their victory celebrations or concessions speeches.

Safety first: The first of the holidays of the summer season approaches with Memorial Day this coming Monday. The highways and byways will be busy with those traveling near and far. And it will be an equally busy time for boaters. Police will be targeting aggressive drivers, wet and dry. Don’t drink and drive. Be careful out there. After all, we want everyone to be around for Independence Day.

Categories: Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.