ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh Tuesday takes |

Pittsburgh Tuesday takes

| Monday, February 17, 2014 9:00 p.m

Ready, set, compete!: Fast on the heels of siccing the state Public Utility Commission on Lyft and Uber, two upstart ride-sharing services that feature a smartphone app to communicate with customers, Yellow Cab, better known for tardy service or no service at all, says it is introducing its own application in response. Isn’t it amazing what competition will do to wake up poor performers enjoying “state” protection? The only thing better could be having the PUC slapped for attempting to restrain free trade. Hint, hint.

About time: Pitt and Allegheny Health Network physicians will participate in a study investigating any links between acetaminophen, the active ingredient in Tylenol, and childhood asthma. Heretofore, much of the focus has been on “pollution” and, in some cases, premature conclusions that it’s the primary cause. But the medical literature is filled with real-world tales of the acetaminophen-asthma links. Here’s to all the possibilities of having the unadulterated scientific method applied with equal rigor.

Can you say “Uncle!”?: The winter that won’t stop continues. Snow, ice and low salt supplies are getting old. But there’s a respite on the way. Beginning on Thursday, three days of temperatures in the 50s are forecast. Yet we’ll perhaps rue for what we’ve all been wishing, what with milder weather creating a lot of muddy messes, even more potholes and forcing river watchers to keep an eye on ice jams.

Categories: Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.