Pittsburgh Tuesday takes |

Pittsburgh Tuesday takes

Can this team save itself?: The 6-4 Steelers are looking for redemption next Monday night when they visit the 2-7 Tennessee Titans. Pittsburgh embarrassed itself mightily in Sunday’s 20-13 loss in New York against the now 2-8 Jets. The game was not as close as the score. The Steelers were, in a word, pathetic. And you know it’s a weird season when the Cleveland Browns stand atop of the AFC North. But the key to Pittsburgh saving itself is as basic as executing the fundamentals.

Fitz’s Jeep lapse: Allegheny County Chief Executive Rich Fitzgerald finds himself in a sticky wicket of his own making. Chelsa Wagner, the county controller and oftentimes Mr. Fitzgerald’s chief antagonist, has documented the ACE’s use of his county vehicle to attend political functions. Fitz defends use of the Jeep, saying he often conducts county business there. That’s no defense. And neither is the fact that the Jeep is seven years old; it’s still a public resource being used improperly. Not only should Fitzgerald stop the practice, he should reimburse the county for politicking on the public dime.

A call for vigilance: Another week, another allegation of the public trust being violated. Baldwin Borough’s Patrick J. Gorman, 78, has been charged with diverting and spending more than $40,000 from veterans groups in Baldwin and Brentwood. How many more such alleged incidents must occur before groups institute tighter financial controls?

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.