ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh Tuesday takes |

Pittsburgh Tuesday takes

Inspired choice: The Pittsburgh Penguins could have played it safe and hired some run-of-the-mill architectural firms to design apartments and public spaces for the old Civic Arena site. But that would have been uninspiring if not downright boring. Instead, the NHL franchise chose Bjarke Ingels Group (known as BIG), the renowned Danish firm. This was an inspired choice. We’re glad to see the Penguins thinking big.

An opportunity: Michael Vick’s signing by the Pittsburgh Steelers has sparked renewed dialogue about animal abuse. And that, of course, is a very good thing. And abuse can include everything from the despicably overt — and we’ll spare you such details here — to the honestly unintentional. (Think leaving a dog in a vehicle on a hot summer day, even with the windows partially down.) Today is a good day to make a donation to your local animal welfare organization to help them better educate the public.

Summer’s not done: September bows today hazy, hot and humid. Which is a good reminder that though the return to school and the return of football (among other sports) makes everyone think of fall, summer is far from done with its run. Which makes this a good time to remind all of those sporting types — and, yes, this includes cheerleaders and band members — to stay hydrated. That said, we’ll all be griping about the cold soon enough.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.