Remembering Arnaud de Borchgrave |

Remembering Arnaud de Borchgrave

The world lost a foreign reporting giant on Sunday. Arnaud de Borchgrave — irascible to the fools he did not suffer gladly, irrepressible in his zeal for his craft and always gracious to those who sought his counsel — died in a Washington hospice. He was 88.

Mr. de Borchgrave, the son of a Belgian count who eschewed aristocracy’s trappings, redefined foreign reportage over his seven decades in the business, having developed a base of sources arguably unparalleled by any single reporter to this day.

Arnaud brought clarity to Cold War coverage. He was on the ground for seven stints in Vietnam. His dispatches from the Middle East during Israel’s Six-Day War, and from dozens of other war zones, were as exquisite for their insight as they were for their prose.

As Newsweek’s chief foreign correspondent for 25 years, his access to leaders — to those good and to those thugs — was phenomenal.

Arnaud later brought credibility and influence to the fledgling Washington Times as editor-in-chief from 1985-91 and later took the helm of United Press International, for which he first reported after World War II.

Always an advocate for a strong national defense, he was a strident anti-Communist from his Center for Strategic and International Studies. His columns regularly appeared in Trib Total Media newspapers.

Today’s reporters could learn much from Arnaud de Borchgrave’s example. We know that we did. And we know that we shall miss him, acutely.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.