State of Corruption: The McCord scandal |

State of Corruption: The McCord scandal

Yet again, scandal has rocked Harrisburg. And it’s time for the citizens of the State of Independence that has become the State of Corruption to take serious stock.

Late Friday, Pennsylvania Treasurer Rob McCord, an unsuccessful candidate for the Democrats’ gubernatorial nomination last year, admitted in a video statement that he attempted to wrangle campaign contributions from two potential contributors by threatening to make it difficult for them to do business with the commonwealth if they didn’t pony up.

Most people would call that what it is — extortion, a political shakedown of the worst kind.

McCord, 55, of Bryn Mawr, and in the middle of his second four-year term as treasurer, will plead guilty to federal charges yet to be filed, his attorneys said.

Said a contrite McCord, who immediately resigned, “I know my improper efforts to raise campaign contributions will forever be a stain on my record.”

And add to the growing stain of rank corruption on the fabric of Pennsylvania.

Rob McCord’s admitted crimes punctuate a decade of reprehensible criminal behavior for Pennsylvania’s political leaders. Those in every branch of state government have been accused of and/or convicted of gross criminal wrongdoing.

It’s an embarrassing pandemic of greed fueled by political power, a contagion that appears to be unstoppable. And it is on the verge of destroying Penn’s Wood. For shame.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.