Sunday pops |

Sunday pops

Among the many postmortems and pontifications after Tuesday’s midterm elections, this one from a USA Today editorial resonates: “President Obama has often seemed smaller than the job in ways that rattled Americans and drove down his approval ratings. If you’re going to govern as a vigorous advocate of a large and activist government, which Obama is, then the government has to be seen as helpful and competent, which it isn’t.” Words to remember, given government’s increasing reach … And among the political flubs and faux pas before the election — so many to choose from — Sen. Mary Landrieu’s is a standout. In an interview with NBC News, the Louisiana Democrat remarked, “I’ll be very, very honest with you. The South has not always been the friendliest place for African Americans. It’s been a difficult time for the president to present himself in a very positive light as a leader.” Never mind the obvious slap to her constituents as the Louisiana Senate race heads into a December runoff. Ms. Landrieu’s own campaign distanced itself from President Obama. … Next to Mr. Obama’s own post-Election Day hangover, Vice President Joe Biden’s must have been a head-pounder. After all, Mr. Biden assured before the election, “If you look at every single major issue of the campaign, the American people agree with our position.” In reality, not so much. But don’t expect any “temperance” from Biden. No, he’ll probably indulge in more of the “hair of the dog” that bit him.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.