The AG-designate: Tough questions for Loretta Lynch
Eric Holder’s politically driven, ultra-liberal tenure as U.S. attorney general heightens the importance of tough Senate confirmation questioning for President Obama’s nominee to succeed him — Loretta Lynch, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York.
Heritage Foundation senior legal fellow Hans von Spakovsky, a former counsel to the assistant attorney general for civil rights, writes for The Daily Signal that commonsense state voter ID laws are among issues on which senators must press Ms. Lynch. In a January speech, she supported Justice Department litigation against such laws, calling them attempts “to take back” gains for which Martin Luther King Jr. fought.
Lynch apparently considers capital punishment racist, too, and took part in an April conference organized by Justice that concluded “racial bias is pervasive” in society. She thus must be questioned about “disparate impact” — the dubious legal notion, lately rejected in a Fair Housing Act case, that different outcomes for different demographic groups suffice to prove discrimination, even without evidence of intent.
What Lynch told Mr. Holder as part of an advisory committee — about his defiance of congressional probes into the IRS targeting and Fast and Furious scandals and other issues — also must be questioned, as must her views on executive-action amnesty for illegal aliens.
Americans deserve answers. The Senate must obtain them.