The Kane dilemma
In dribs and drabs — and now in one large dollop — the commonwealth’s prospective criminal case against Attorney General Kathleen Kane finally is on full display. And it is quite ugly.
Monday’s long-awaited public release of a Norristown grand jury’s presentment against the first-term Democrat AG details a shocking tale of alleged perjury, false swearing, abuse of office, official oppression and obstructing the administration of law. And it allegedly was orchestrated in an attempt to embarrass her political enemies.
Kane denies any wrongdoing.
Whether Kane is charged with these crimes continues to rest with Montgomery County District Attorney Risa Vetri Ferman. Not only must Ms. Ferman decide whether Kane goes to trial on the grand jury allegations but also whether she should be found in criminal contempt of court for firing a protected witness.
Kane, of course, deserves her day in court. But given the allegations, and the evidence supporting them — primarily inconsistencies in her grand jury testimony with that of multiple witnesses — it’s difficult to see how she can credibly remain as Pennsylvania’s chief law-enforcement officer.