The lame-duck session: Keep the GOP’s powder dry |

The lame-duck session: Keep the GOP’s powder dry

Duck hunting season begins this week on Capitol Hill — lame duck, that is. The first test of newly empowered Republican leaders, who next year will shepherd congressional majorities in both chambers, will be to stand firm against any frivolity from soon-to-be minority Senate Democrats and in-name-only Republicans in both houses.

Historically, lame-duck sessions are notorious for self-serving legislation if not disastrous swan songs from lawmakers heading for the door. Heaven knows what nonsense disillusioned Democrats (or some Republicans) will try to push through.

On must-pass measures both fiscal (the appropriations bill) and military, close attention must be paid to any add-ons, especially new legislation that the next GOP-led Congress will have to swallow. On the other hand, some tax breaks set to expire at year’s end must be addressed.

Then there’s President Obama with his pen and phone, suggesting unilateral action on wholesale amnesty for illegal aliens. This is not what Americans voted for on Nov. 4.

“He will poison the well, and there will be no chance for immigration reform moving,” says House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio.

There’s also the president’s pending replacement for Attorney General Eric Holder. Forcing an unpopular nomination now would ignite a firefight.

Fortunately, observers expect a short-lived lame-duck session. What the GOP does — and doesn’t do — will set the stage for the next Congress.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.