The Legislature: The joke’s on us |

The Legislature: The joke’s on us

What does one call the country’s largest “full-time” state legislature that’s in session for only a few months a year?

A misnomer.

And if that steams Pennsylvania’s lawmakers — base salary, $81,000 — who insist there’s no reason to change what “works,” then let them produce a log each year detailing their “constituent services,” time devoted to “writing legislation” and whatever else they’re supposedly doing outside of Harrisburg.

After a nearly three-month summer break, state representatives and senators will return to the Capitol on Monday for a few weeks of what’s sure to be inconsequential business before heading out on the campaign trail in mid-October, The Philadelphia Inquirer reminds. And those who win re-election on Nov. 6 won’t return to work until mid-January.

Total time “in session” for 2012 will be about 60 working days, The Inquirer reports. The actual time spent “legislating” isn’t much different than when the Legislature was part-time, says political analyst G. Terry Madonna.

What’s revealed is a legislative calendar that’s tailored not to the public’s business but to campaigning and fundraising, says former state Rep. Jeff Coleman, an Armstrong County Republican.

Pennsylvanians deserve better. And if incumbents seeking re-election want to be taken seriously about the reforms they promote, they can start with a serious examination of a part-time state Legislature.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.