The race for president: Looking toward November |

The race for president: Looking toward November

“It ain’t over till it’s over,” late New York Yankees great Yogi Berra supposedly said. And though it’s true the primary election season has another six weeks to go, the races for the Republican and Democrat nominations for president essentially ended Tuesday in Pennsylvania and four other eastern states.

Hillary Clinton didn’t sweep the day but her four wins were enough to force rival Bernie Sanders to effectively concede the Democrat nomination. He more than intimated that he’s staying in the race only to secure as many delegates as possible to strengthen his role at this summer’s Philadelphia convention.

Donald Trump claimed the mantle of “presumptive” Republican nominee with stunning vote ratios that only can be seen as an open, if not angry, voter rebuke of rivals Ted Cruz and John Kasich. To wit, it appears by one accounting that Mr. Trump has secured commitments from two-thirds of Pennsylvania’s unbound delegates.

Some political cypherists calculate that Trump could win the nomination outright should his steamroller roll on in Indiana next week and in California in June. Messrs. Cruz (even with his Hail Carly Fiorina running mate selection Wednesday) and Kasich would become asterisks. And the donnybrook that was to be the Cleveland convention could end up as a far more placid brook.

Mrs. Clinton and Trump appropriately have begun their pivot toward the general election. As shall we.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.