The student-loan balloon |

The student-loan balloon

There’s nothing remotely “forgiving” in President Obama’s student loan bailout, which posted an almost $22 billion shortfall last year.

Neatly buried in Mr. Obama’s 2016 budget, the loss is “the largest ever recorded for any government credit program,” Politico reports. And it’s only going to get worse.

Under Obama’s blind beneficence to make higher education “more affordable,” loan payments are limited to 10 percent of the borrower’s income. Outstanding debt is forgiven after 20 years — or 10 years if the borrower lands work in public service.

And recently Obama has directed federal agencies to “overhaul” the way Americans repay their student loan debts. The Student Aid Bill of Rights calls for a website, by July 2016, to give borrowers an avenue to file complaints about federal student lenders and collection agencies.

Meanwhile, colleges have even less incentive to contain tuition hikes as taxpayers will end up picking up the tab, notes the American Enterprise Institute.

And how convenient, too, that the $22 billion can simply be added to the deficit without approval from Congress.

Rather than realistically addressing an estimated $1.3 trillion in student loan debt, Obama is determined to dig an even deeper hole. That “hissing” sound you hear is air going into a balloon, which Congress must deflate before this student-loan lunacy goes “Boom!”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.