ShareThis Page
The Thursday wrap |

The Thursday wrap

| Wednesday, February 25, 2015 9:00 p.m

President Obama says he vetoed the Keystone XL pipeline project because it cut short “thorough consideration” of the issue. Mr. Obama redefines the word “crock.” … How new Veterans Affairs boss Robert McDonald survives his lie to a homeless veteran that he had served in America’s “special forces” is difficult to see. It’s all the more stunning considering Mr. McDonald had a distinguished military career. In a Monday night mea culpa, McDonald apologized and said he had no excuse for the lie. Given who he is and the job he holds, he also should have no job. …Doing his best impersonation of Jimmy Carter, Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf says Pennsylvania’s biggest economic problem is “low self-esteem.” This is the same governor who, next week, apparently is prepared to announce a broad swath of tax increases. Nothing quite like tax increases to make taxpayers feel economically better about themselves, eh? … The World Health Organization (WHO) is taking the concept of food police to a new and intrusive level. It says countries should ban advertising to children a long list of desserts it has compiled. Among those items that the Washington Free Beacon says are “to be banned without exception” are croissants and fruit pies. Here’s a better idea: Tell WHO “Not from our buttery, sticky hands!” Isn’t there a malaria outbreak somewhere?

Categories: Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.