The Thursday wrap |

The Thursday wrap

A Democratic Party that midterm-election voters decreed to be increasingly irrelevant just keeps shooting itself in the foot. Witness Tuesday’s Senate filibuster that not only again stalled consideration of the Keystone XL pipeline but also intensified the battle between environmentalists and unionists. And even though the GOP did not prevail, at least for now, the entertainment value of watching two reliably liberal acolytes beat each other up is priceless. … You know the state of “progressivism” (ne “liberalism”) is on the rocks when a quite liberal attorney decides to represent House Republicans in their lawsuit against President Obama for the unconstitutional implementation of ObamaCare. None other than Jonathan Turley has signed on to the effort. The George Washington University professor long has railed against the executive branch’s usurpation of congressional power. As Mr. Turley put it, “in the Madisonian system, it is as important how you do something as what you do.” Hear! Hear! … A British press account notes that former adult movie star Asia Lemmon (real name, Jessica Steinhauser) has, in Utah, become the fourth person in the United States to be allowed to have her driver’s license photo taken while wearing a colander on her head. Why? For religious reasons. Ms. Steinhauser, a self-described “Pastafarian,” claims to be a member of the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. Too bad DMV officials didn’t insist she first fill the colander with spaghetti, sauce and meatballs.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.