The Thursday wrap |

The Thursday wrap

That revealing University of Pennsylvania website video featuring ObamaCare co-architect Jonathan Gruber has mysteriously been pulled. Mr. Gruber told Penn’s Health Economics Conference in October 2013 that lack of transparency in the law was key to its passage and that “the stupidity of the American voter … was really, really critical to get the thing to pass.” The group known as American Commitments recently unearthed the video. Gruber apologized his week for “speaking off the cuff … inappropriately.” Nonetheless, it shows the depths of deception to which the Obama administration always is willing to stoop. … Former Congressman Joe Sestak, D-Pa., is ramping up his prospective 2016 campaign against Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa. Mr. Sestak released a scathing email attack against Mr. Toomey on Veterans Day that ripped him for supposedly being unresponsive to veterans’ needs. Toomey narrowly defeated Sestak in 2010 in a nasty race that cost about $23 million. Expect the rematch to be nastier and even more expensive. … It’s here! It might have taken a little longer than usual to arrive but the first real cold blast of fall air has arrived. And while the region won’t experience the kind of extreme winter weather that’s been marching across the country, temperatures in the 20s and 30s are a stark reminder of the need to winterize everything from the house to the car to the pets. But surely the cold weather will be a blessing to retailers now rolling out the Christmas shopping season.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.