Archive

The Thursday wrap | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

The Thursday wrap

The latest economy-stunting “gift” from President Obama’s grab bag of government goodies is a new executive order requiring federal contractors to provide their employees with up to seven days of paid sick leave each year. Even if the rule applies only to new federal contracts beginning in 2017, according to The New York Times, the upshot is clear: “For workers whose employers can’t absorb the cost, it’s an arbitrary expense that will ultimately result in shorter hours, lower pay or disappearing jobs,” says Jack Mozloom, media director of the National Federation of Independent Business. … Among stops on Obama’s jet-setting climate-change tour was Exit Glacier in Alaska, where the president blamed mankind’s use of fossil fuels for the glacier’s steady melting. But the glacier has been shrinking since 1815, long before mankind’s industrialization, writes Betsy McCaughey for the New York Post. And according to the Alaska Climate Research Center, there’s been almost no evidence of warming trends in Alaska since 1977, Ms. McCaughey reports — that is, aside from climate cluckers’ incessant hot air. … Scientists at Colorado State University have released a new, albeit controversial, study that questions whether the Atlantic could be entering a quieter cycle of hurricane activity, similar to the 1970s and ’80s. They cite a drop in localized cooling and salinity levels in the North Atlantic near Greenland. A cyclical weather pattern? Why, that’s heresy to the Church of Global Warming.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.