Archive

Trib editorial: Post-Parkland, the case for bolstering background checks | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Trib editorial: Post-Parkland, the case for bolstering background checks

GunsBackgroundCheckLegislation22402jpgb9399
Jacqueline Larma/AP
Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., and Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., announced at a press conference Monday, March 5, 2018, in Philadelphia that they'll introduce a bill that will require federal authorities to notify states when a felon or a fugitive attempts to buy a firearm but fails the National Instant Criminal Background Check System.
GunsBackgroundCheckLegislation22402jpgb9399
Jacqueline Larma/AP
Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., and Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., announced at a press conference Monday, March 5, 2018, in Philadelphia that they'll introduce a bill that will require federal authorities to notify states when a felon or a fugitive attempts to buy a firearm but fails the National Instant Criminal Background Check System.

If 17 deaths at a Parkland, Fla., high school are to inspire effective action to prevent more mass shootings — not just “thoughts and prayers” before lawmakers and the public move on — consensus must form for passage of new legislation. That’s a tall order in today’s hyper-polarized political environment.

But U.S. Sen Pat Toomey, R-Pa., has a good, bipartisan idea for just such a measure, which deserves to become law.

Along with Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., Mr. Toomey proposes requiring federal authorities to notify state law enforcers when the National Instant Criminal Background Check System rejects attempted gun purchases by felons or fugitives, according to The Associated Press. As Toomey says, this proposal respects Second Amendment rights while “making it more difficult for people who shouldn’t have firearms to obtain them.”

What’s proposed wouldn’t prevent all mass shootings or shut down criminals’ black-market gun transfers. But it would strengthen existing safeguards by bolstering background checks for those seeking firearms from licensed dealers — a system that has failed to keep guns out of the hands of some past mass shooters.

Whether the Toomey-Coons proposal will become part of a Senate background-check bill dubbed “Fix NICS,” which has bipartisan and National Rifle Association support, is unclear. But post-Parkland, strengthening background checks is an idea that all Americans can and should support — and one that Congress should pass.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.