Trumpeting ObamaCare: The Medicaid factor |

Trumpeting ObamaCare: The Medicaid factor

As the Obama administration trumpets a government survey showing a dramatic “decline” in the number of uninsured Americans — which supposedly is at its lowest level in 50 years — a closer look behind the curtain of this medicine show is warranted.

Marginally mentioned in all the hoopla is the corresponding increase in Medicaid patients between January 2014 and March 2015, stemming from states’ expansion of federally-funded medicine under ObamaCare. At 12 million people and growing, Medicaid enrollment is skyrocketing past some states’ expectations.

As the survey by the National Center for Health Statistics shows, the number of Americans without health insurance has dropped by 15.8 million since 2013. But the drop is steeper in states that expanded Medicaid. In those states, the percentage of uninsured adults, 18 to 64 years old, declined from 18.4 percent in 2013 to 10.6 percent in the first quarter of 2015.

“Most of this is Medicaid,” says Heritage Foundation health policy scholar Ed Haislmaier.

And ignoring Medicaid’s growing enrollment is disingenuous when Medicaid patients, unlike private insurance clients, have fewer treatment options or doctors from which to choose.

All this will become an especially bitter pill after 2016. That’s when the states get saddled with more of Medicaid’s tab.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.