ShareThis Page
Tuesday takes: Pittsburgh Tribune-Review |

Tuesday takes: Pittsburgh Tribune-Review

| Monday, June 11, 2012 10:46 p.m

Good grief: The latest Allegheny County employee roster, as of June 7, takes an entire ream of paper to print. If that’s not a pretty stark indicator that county government is too big, we don’t know what is.

Huba, huba: The Allegheny County Airport Authority will spend nearly $300,000 to study whether Pittsburgh could serve as a hub to restore service to other, smaller Pennsylvania towns. But it’s doubtful such a plan would work without even more taxpayer subsidies. Public demand should drive service, not the government.

Another wake-up call: Joshua DeNinno of Moon is charged with stealing nearly $61,000 from the Pittsburgh Planned Giving Council, where he was a volunteer. It’s the latest in a series of thefts by those associated with nonprofit and/or charitable groups. And it’s the latest reason for such organizations to tighten their financial practices.

Let’s go, Bucs!: The Pittsburgh Pirates find themselves tied with Cincinnati for first place in the National League Central as they open a three-game set in Baltimore tonight. The Pirates swept Kansas City over the weekend. While it’s premature to revive the old fight song “The Bucs Are Goin’ All the Way,” the Bucs certainly are going in the right direction right now.

Categories: Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.