U.N. Watch: A gift for Russia |

U.N. Watch: A gift for Russia

AFP/Getty Images
Russian President Vladimir Putin attends the final press conference on the second day of the G-20 Summit in Hamburg, Germany, July 8, 2017. (AFP/Getty Images)

Under an alleged deal that reeks of politics, a Vladimir Putin puppet has been named undersecretary-general to the United Nations’ newly created Office of Counter-Terror. And that more than likely will continue the world body’s pathetic response to terrorism — depending, of course, on who’s doing the terrorizing.

Vladimir Voronkov, a Russian senior diplomat, will “coordinate” the U.N.’s counterterrorism activities with a budget of $15 million. (The U.S. funds 22 percent of the U.N. budget).

Multiple sources tell CBS News that Russia agreed to pass up its regional turn in the selection of Turtle Bay’s new secretary-general in exchange for the leadership post at the new U.N. counterterrorism office.

“It was the old U.N. spoils system at work, involving a retrograde Cold War invader who will undo what remains of U.N. relevance today,” writes Hugh Dugan, who has advised U.S. ambassadors as a longtime U.S. delegate at the world body.

As for Mr. Voronkov, he was the Kremlin’s representative in negotiations that led to the odorous Iran nuclear deal in 2015. His boss is an ex-KGB professional who makes his critics disappear. And his country is aiding Syria’s Bashar al-Assad in the slaughter of his own people.

These are the qualifications for the U.N.’s new counterterrorism chief? Anyone familiar with the currents that churn Turtle Bay shouldn’t be surprised.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.