U.N. Watch: Whistle spittle
Just how well the United Nations supposedly polices itself reveals the culture of corruption that permeates Turtle Bay.
Back in 2005, former Secretary-General Kofi Annan established whistle-blower “protections” and a new Ethics Office to receive reports of wrongdoing. The outcome has been farcical.
One unnamed witness likened whistle-blower protection to wax fruit: “It looks good, but you can’t eat it,” writes Beatrice Edwards, executive director of the Government Accountability Project, for Fox News.
In short order the U.N. Development Programme, no stranger to controversy, decreed that the then-new policy didn’t apply to it. And Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has since “tacitly encouraged other U.N. agencies to do the same,” Ms. Edwards reports.
Today, the U.N. Ethics Office has “devolved into a hodgepodge of fiefdoms,” Edwards says.
At issue is more than so-called U.N. “ethics.” Billions of U.S. dollars annually are poured into this sieve.
Secretary of State John Kerry is supposed to vouch for each U.N. body’s whistle-blower protections or withhold 15 percent of U.S. funding. But Mr. Kerry evidently sees nothing wrong.
Given the United Nations’ deaf ear — and Mr. Kerry’s blind eye — Congress needs to take a closer look at how U.N. whistle-blowers are protected and, by law, cut U.S. funding accordingly.