ShareThis Page
United Nations Watch: Human rights? |

United Nations Watch: Human rights?

Countries that challenge the United Nations’ abysmal record on human rights typically are ignored. Some are chastised.

But Norway?

At the recent Oslo Freedom Forum, Bard Glad Pedersen, Norway’s secretary for foreign affairs, took issue with the “gap” between “commitment on one hand” and “reality on the ground,” which he said is “unacceptable.”

Mr. Pedersen continued: “In the U.N., states with bad human rights records are actively working to undermine human rights and they are building alliances among themselves. This threatens human rights and also confidence in the U.N.,” according to the group U.N. Watch.

That’s hardly surprising with the likes of China, Cuba, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela among the Human Rights Council’s 47 members.

This sorry joke wasn’t lost on a contingent of North Korean officials, who recently showed up at a U.N. human rights event. Members laughed at accounts from former North Korean labor camp detainees and they mocked the ambassador of Botswana with a racial epithet, according to one account. This, when former prisoners told of being beaten until they vomited blood and tortured while they hung upside down, CNN reports.

Yet the U.N.’s advocates for human rights pay lip service to North Korea while routinely excoriating their favorite whipping boy, Israel. It’s an intolerable mockery that turns the very concept of “human rights” on its head.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.