UPMC genital photos: Unprofessional & outrageous |
Local News

UPMC genital photos: Unprofessional & outrageous

UPMC Bedford.

“Unprofessional” and “outrageous” are just two fitting descriptions of the indignity to which a UPMC Bedford Memorial patient with a genital injury was subjected when hospital staff photographed the injury with their cellphones. Then they reportedly circulated the images around the hospital — and even shared them with at least one employee's spouse.

Staff conduct in this Dec. 23 episode shockingly demonstrated utter disregard, if not outright contempt, for the privacy and confidentiality any patient expects — regardless of what treatment is being administered. That UPMC self-reported the incident to the state Health Department in no way mitigates its seriousness — or excuses what investigators say happened.

A doctor wanted a photo taken with an operating-room camera for future medical lectures. Staff thought it was broken, so out came their personal phones — and into that OR came staffers with no business being there, so many that one likened the scene to a “cheerleader-type pyramid.”

Even worse, investigators determined that the OR camera wasn't broken, but “just too complicated to use” — which raises troubling questions about staff training.

The Health Department issued citations but mentions no fines. The hospital suspended two doctors and replaced its nursing director for surgical services. Whether a criminal investigation will occur is unclear. What is clear is that, isolated incident or not, this is an egregious breach of patient trust in medical professionals.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.