ShareThis Page
Verbatim |


| Saturday, March 22, 2014 9:00 p.m

“It is hard to name even a single country that has more respect and admiration for America today than when President Obama took office, and now Russia is in Ukraine. Part of (Obama’s and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s) failure, I submit, is due to their failure to act when action was possible, and needed.”

­— Mitt Romney, former Massachusetts governor and 2012 Republican presidential nominee, writing in The Wall Street Journal.

“A KGB guy in his natural state, bad enough, but now he’s spent all this money being noticed for his big moment on the world stage, reassembling the Soviet Union, and nobody is seeing it, which means, folks, that he’s going to have to amp it up.”

— Rush Limbaugh, on his radio show, theorizing that Russian President Vladimir Putin is angry how the world media spotlight has been focused on the missing Malaysian airliner and not him.

“Theory and practice have both showed that market allocation of resources is the most efficient.”

— Chinese President Xi Jinping, quoted in The Weekly Standard, admitting the deleterious effects of government command economics.

“The current (Girl Scout) Law drops ‘courteous’ for ‘courage and strength.’ ‘Thrifty’ becomes the progressive gobbledygook ‘use resources wisely.’ Even worse, the matchless virtues to be ‘clean in thought, word and deed’ becomes the socialist cliche ‘make the world a better place.’”

— Deborah C. Tyler, a lifelong Girl Scout, writing in the American Thinker on changes to the Girl Scout Law.

“My advice is to assume improved conditions and to throw the lead pass.”

— Democrat strategist James Carville, writing in The Hill, on the party’s chances in this fall’s midterm elections.

Categories: Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.