ShareThis Page
Caution guides today’s military leaders |
Featured Commentary

Caution guides today’s military leaders

| Friday, May 22, 2015 8:57 p.m

National Geographic last winter aired an important piece of 20th-century Americana on its TV channel. It was called simply “American War Generals.”

The names involved were famous ones — legendary four-star generals Colin Powell, Barry McCaffrey and Jack Keane, among others. Almost without exception, all six or so of the generals condemned not only the Vietnam War but also those more recent disasters — the Iraq and Afghan wars.

“Where were those generals,” you may well ask, “when those wars were being waged above our heads? Why do they complain only now, when there is nothing we can do about it?”

Well, one of the main reasons is that, had they not supported these wars when they were waged, they would have had to retire. Thus, we see this saga of leading military men now putting down the very wars they led.

But America often changes in quiet ways, and perhaps we can hope that is what’s happening now.

This spring began the winding down of Gen. Martin Dempsey’s tenure as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. This short, fit, bulldog of an officer has altered the underlying principles of war in the 21st century — much for the better. Quietly, but with the conviction of the sensible man, Dempsey has changed the military’s approach from the crazy wastefulness of the past to, as The Wall Street Journal put it, “one of caution about U.S. military engagements and reliance on local partners.”

The next man who will walk in Dempsey’s shoes is Marine Corps Commandant Gen. Joseph Dunford Jr. This slim man from Boston will take over the chairmanship on Oct. 1 and, wonder of wonders, Dunford, too, is a cautious general.

He has served in Afghanistan, speeding up the transition to American troops spending the greatest amount of their time training Afghans. In contrast to the generals who marched into Iraq and Baghdad in 2003 and quickly wiped out the Iraqi army, taking all the responsibility on themselves, the Dunford “way” is to attempt to empower local forces.

But it is not going to be easy. We say we cannot bear the presence on Earth of the barbaric savages of ISIS; we say ISIS must be destroyed, under any circumstance; we say wars are not won only by air power but by “boots on the ground.”

Yet the American public is sensible enough to know this is the one thing it does not want. And at the same time, it is the one thing the Islamic State does want. These terrorists have told the rare visitor from the civilized world, repeated in their speeches and propaganda, that they want above all to fight American troops on the sands of Iraq.

How this new military leadership will deny ISIS fighters their wish, and at the same time defeat them, is the conundrum we face.

Yes, we are fighting a war over there — and we should never forget that. But at least this time, we have men in charge who appear to have their heads on very straight.

Georgie Anne Geyer has been a foreign correspondent and commentator on international affairs for more than 40 years (

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.