Archive

ShareThis Page
Davis’ own self-destruction | TribLIVE.com
Featured Commentary

Davis’ own self-destruction

by MICHELLE MALKIN
| Sunday, November 2, 2014 9:00 p.m.

Wendy Russell Davis is on fire. And I don’t mean that in a good way. I mean it in a five-alarm, set-her-own-skirt-aflame, billowing-human-torch kind of way.

The Democrat darling of the Hollywood left thought her path to the Texas governor’s mansion would be a pink-sneakered walk in the park. Instead, her campaign has imploded.

The high point of Davis’ career came last year when she flamboyantly opposed state restrictions on late-term abortions in the wake of Philadelphia abortionist Kermit Gosnell’s conviction. Gosnell’s clinic provoked national revulsion.

Militant gender-identity politics, however, can only get you so far.

Davis’ gubernatorial bid this past month has been a series of unfortunate, cringe-inducing events exposing her empty soul. She insanely accused her opponent, Republican state Attorney General Greg Abbott, of wanting to ban “interracial marriage.” Abbott’s wife, Cecilia, is the Hispanic granddaughter of Mexican immigrants.

The week before, Davis ridiculed Abbott’s physical disability with a vulgar TV ad featuring an empty wheelchair. Abbott was paralyzed in 1984 when a tree fell on top of him while he was jogging.

To bolster her bona fides, the Davis campaign disseminated a photo of young female “friends” posing on Twitter after voting for the Democrat candidate. The photo, however, turned out to be a pilfered image of young Virginia College Republicans getting out the vote for GOP Senate candidate Ed Gillespie. The “imaginary friends” of Davis became a social media mockfest.

Desperate for positive press, Davis welcomed New York City liberal Jon Stewart to Austin, Texas, for a last-ditch appeal on his comedy show. But Stewart didn’t mention the trail of discredited autobiographical details Davis exploited to gain a national platform.

The Dallas Morning News reported earlier this year that she “blurred” several “key facts” of her rags-to-riches story. As feminists hailed the single mother for putting herself through Harvard University while caring for two young daughters, it emerged that a second husband had taken custody of Davis’ girls, cashed in his 401(k) and secured a loan to support her higher ambitions.

Which-Way Wendy tried to pivot from her biography botch by becoming a born-again Second Amendment rights advocate (after working to ban gun shows while serving on the Fort Worth city council).

She attempted to burnish her border-control credentials by supporting Republican calls for an Ebola travel ban from West African countries (after earlier attacking Abbott over his “’stop the invasion’ rhetoric” and accusing him of disliking “people who don’t look like him”).

And she claimed she would support legislation banning abortions after 20 weeks — after vaulting into the national spotlight with her 13-hour filibuster on the Texas Senate floor last year against the very bill that would have outlawed late-term abortions and cracked down on dangerous clinics like the one Gosnell operated for 15 years.

Wendy Davis bet all her feminist marbles on her chromosomes. After Election Day, all she will have to show for it are well-coifed selfies and the ashes of her Vogue magazine fashion photo spread.

Michelle Malkin is the author of “Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks and Cronies” (Regnery 20090).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.