One more chance for the GOP |
Featured Commentary

One more chance for the GOP

I’m sorry to have to tell you this, America, but Andrew Cotto is done defending you to his European friends at dinner parties.

You brought this on yourself — as Cotto explains in his article “My American exceptionalism fantasy is over: How these midterms sealed the deal.” Cotto is a novelist no one has heard of and also teaches creative writing at CUNY, so he’s very big.

More bad news from “O’Reilly is losing, and he knows it.” That’s why Republicans swept everything from U.S. senator to substitute-part-time-dog catcher. Oh well, it was fun while it lasted, Bill.

Also, Gov. Scott Walker’s victory in Wisconsin, marking the third time he’s crushed the left, should embarrass Republicans. Liberals didn’t care about Wisconsin, you idiots! As Ana Marie Cox explained on The Daily Beast, Walker was “too boring to beat.”

Are you humiliated yet, Wisconsin? Just wait, there’s more. At the Walker victory party, Cox wrote, attendees went home 30 minutes after Walker spoke and “there was still beer left.”

Cotto and Cox aren’t going to lose their contempt for you, America — you’re just going to have to live with that — but I have some commendations and assignments.

Libertarians and tea partyers, you were fantastic this election. Third-party libertarian voters didn’t cause us to lose any elections, except probably in Virginia, where Republican Ed Gillespie nearly pulled off a come-from-behind shocker. We’ll call that one an unintentional error by libertarians.

Tea partyers prevented an outright Republican win only in Louisiana, which doesn’t matter because there’s a runoff. They are now united behind Bill Cassidy. But don’t take the runoff for granted, Republicans.

Republicans better be putting everything they have into winning that Dec. 6 runoff. There’s a big difference between having 53 Senate seats and 54.

Don’t come to me in January and say, We got bored, it was cold, I forgot to vote. The Democrats aren’t bored. They want that seat.

In return for the tea party not pushing crazy candidates this election, the GOP establishment had better abandon its corporate-benefactor-pleasing ways.

People who voted Republican took the attitude of “We’re giving you one more chance.” They are not backing off. They’re looking the GOP in the eye and saying: We’re not fooling around. Amnesty is dead, right?

Republicans won by ignoring the establishment when it said, Don’t criticize amnesty! and ignoring the tea party when it said, Let’s run candidates like Christine O’Donnell!

Republicans’ sole objective for the next two years is to keep sending President Obama bills that 80 percent of Americans will support. They can pass some great legislation — and they’ll also force Democrats into votes that won’t be easy to explain to their constituents. Republicans might start by dusting off that bill requiring Congress to live under ObamaCare.

Sen. Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has played a lousy hand well and now he’ll have a majority. Even in the minority, McConnell got every single Republican to vote against ObamaCare and tricked the president into automatic spending cuts with the sequester — an amazing triumph later blown by idiots like Paul Ryan.

Do not blow this, Republicans. Andrew Cotto may be done defending America at dinner parties, but a majority of voters are giving you one more chance.

Ann Coulter is legal affairs correspondent for Human Events.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.