ShareThis Page
Our national GPS device |
Featured Commentary

Our national GPS device

| Thursday, August 7, 2014 8:55 p.m

You’ve no doubt seen those polls where Americans are asked if they think our country is heading in the right direction. Whether the answer is yes or no, we all know it’s not scientific. It’s based on a general impression, and those impressions are shaped by what we read and see on the news, and on what we know is happening to ourselves, friends and family.

But what if we could actually measure the direction we’re going in? Surely we could give a more informed answer.

I couldn’t help but think about that as I read the 2014 Index of Culture and Opportunity, just published by The Heritage Foundation. Subtitled “The Social and Economic Trends that Shape America,” it’s an eye-opening snapshot of the direction we’re going. It’s a mix of good and bad news. Among the highlights of this year’s report:

• The family tax burden. The amount of money extracted from our paychecks is a good place to start. According to Heritage chief economist Stephen Moore, that tax burden has grown from about 5 percent of national income a century ago to almost 20 percent today. It’s 1.7 percentage points higher than it was in 2004, corresponding roughly to the rise in government spending.

• The decline in entrepreneurship. The American economy is more innovative, dynamic and prosperous than the economies of many other industrialized nations — and startup companies are a big part of the reason. Unfortunately, startups have been in decline since the Carter administration, when they made up 14 percent of all American companies. It’s hard to say why, but as economist Tim Kane writes: “Bureaucratic regulations are growing at the same time startups are declining. Coincidence?”

• The drop in marriage rates. Free fall is more like it. The marriage rate has fallen by about 50 percent since the 1960s. According to W. Bradford Wilcox, “only about half of the nation’s adults are currently married, and … about half of the nation’s children will spend some time outside an intact, married home.” Given the many negative effects this has on children, this is alarming.

• The change in educational achievement. Sometimes the most interesting charts aren’t the ones that show dramatic change, but the ones that show very little change. Take the one that shows a flat line for the reading proficiency of 17-year-olds. It’s almost exactly what it was in 1971, despite significant increases in per-pupil spending. If more money was the answer, wouldn’t it be much higher today?

• The rise in school choice. More than 300,000 children today are attending schools chosen by them and their parents, thanks to such school-choice options as vouchers, tuition tax credits and education savings accounts. That’s quite a jump from 2000, when fewer than 50,000 children were able to take advantage of school choice to gain a better education.

• The overhyped decline in religion. We’re often told that religion is virtually disappearing in the U.S. or at least is in serious decline. But over the last 40 years, there have been only small variations in church attendance.

Political debates often focus on ways to get America “back on track.” But we need a better sense of where we are. Like a national GPS, the Index of Culture and Opportunity shows us where we’re succeeding — and where we’re failing. Let’s use it.

Ed Feulner is founder of The Heritage Foundation (

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.