ShareThis Page
Paul Kengor: Parkland result of our loss of values |
Featured Commentary

Paul Kengor: Parkland result of our loss of values

| Saturday, March 3, 2018 9:00 p.m
Bela Urbina, a 15-year-old student at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla., speaks to the 1,000 protesters gathered at the Florida Capitol for the Rally in Tally in Tallahassee, Fla., Monday, Feb. 26, 2018. (AP Photo/Mark Wallheiser)

For the names of each dead teen in Parkland, Fla., we could name other infamous school shootings: Columbine, Sandy Hook, the Amish schoolhouse in central Pennsylvania, Virginia Tech. Where does this madness end? I fear it only gets worse. This is above all not a failure of gun laws or FBI checks or warning signs of mental illness. This is a descent from decency to the diabolical. And first and foremost, it’s a catastrophic loss of values in our culture.

Think about it: If this was merely a matter of guns, there would have been school shootings — and church and other mass shootings — for decades, if not centuries. This is new.

A 78-year-old told me what I already knew: When he was in school in the 1950s, he regularly walked in carrying his .22-caliber rifle, which he placed in his locker. Other boys did the same. After school, the gym teacher grabbed his shotgun and drove fields with them, shooting rabbits. No one thought of shooting a classmate.

My mom talks of her parents taking in hunters as “boarders” during deer season in Emporium, Pa. These were strangers, often steelworkers and coal miners coming from Pittsburgh to hunt in the mountains. Many were World War II vets, some surely plagued by what we’d call “PTSD.” They brought ammo into the house and cleaned their rifles in their bedrooms. My grandma woke them up at 5 a.m., made them breakfast, and off they went into the woods. And guess what? Not a single murder.

This, too, was during the 1950s, a decade that liberals ridicule for its homey and hokey values. But let’s leave the ’50s out of this. After all, this civil America existed virtually every decade until recent times.

When I was in high school in the early 1980s, we had a gun club. Remember those? They were everywhere. In 1984, New York state had 65 school-district rifle teams. Schools were not gun-free zones. And yet, no mass shootings.

I recall coming home from school in the 1980s, grabbing my shotgun and trekking across my suburban neighborhood to woods to hunt. No one blinked.

Liberals will scoff at this as simplistic, but it’s truly remarkable that the rise in gun violence in public schools follows removal of God from public schools. Sure, added factors are at play. Yet no way is it a mere coincidence that our government schools have experienced anarchy precisely as they’ve purged Judeo-Christian values. Bibles, prayer and any notion of instructing, let alone posting, the Ten Commandments, the Beatitudes, the theological or cardinal virtues are verboten . Teacher friends of mine whisper fears of being disciplined as they struggle to carefully introduce any semblance of Christian moral ethics into their classrooms.

We strip all this, then expect public schools to be paragons of propriety. What we have is an implosion of basic morality that no gun restrictions will fix.

This nation’s culture of Christendom, its bedrock for over 200 years, has been shattered. We’re living with the results. Welcome to post-Christian America. Pretty ugly, isn’t it?

Paul Kengor is professor of political science and executive director of The Center for Vision & Values at Grove City College. His books include “A Pope and a President: John Paul II, Ronald Reagan and the Extraordinary Untold Story of the 20th Century.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.