ShareThis Page
Quotables: Allegheny Valley Hospital’s healthy prognosis |
Featured Commentary

Quotables: Allegheny Valley Hospital’s healthy prognosis

| Monday, March 26, 2018 9:00 p.m
Jack Fordyce | Tribune-Review
Bill Englert, Allegheny Valley Hospital president and chief executive officer, speaks at the Tribune-Review's Valley News Dispatch office in Tarentum.

Despite increased competition among the region’s health-care providers and continual demands from insurers, the prognosis for Allegheny Valley Hospital, part of the Allegheny Health Network, is positive, says President and CEO Bill Englert, who met recently with the Valley News Dispatch editorial board. That’s clear from Highmark Inc.‘s nearly $30 million investment in the Harrison medical center. Included in that sum is $8 million for electronic records and $4 million for a linear accelerator, used to treat cancer. It’s also encouraging to see AVH working to reduce rates of patient readmittance through its Community Care Network. Mr. Englert outlined a health-care center that has evolved to meet today’s needs.

“I’ve been around a long time, and the leadership is headed in the right direction. It’s rewarding to see the direction you’re going, and Highmark has really worked to fund us very well.”

“That’s sort of where our focus is now — in creating this new model of care to improve the access for patients, make it understandable for them, get them involved in their care, and make it the least expensive as possible for that member. You’re always looking out of the corner of your eye at competition, but it’s not something that’s at the top of the radar.”

“There’s a lot of research (that’s) going to happen there (AHN’s recently unveiled plans for a Cancer Institute Academic Center) but really the model is … to put the cancer centers out into the community. It’s not a centric model; it’s actually just the opposite.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.