ShareThis Page
Quotables: HIV an offshoot of opioid abuse |
Featured Commentary

Quotables: HIV an offshoot of opioid abuse

| Wednesday, March 21, 2018 9:00 p.m
Evan Sanders | Trib Total Media
A used syringe lies along Nutt Avenue in Uniontown. More of the devices used to inject heroin are turning up along roadsides and in parking lots.

As if the region’s opioid epidemic wasn’t sufficiently tragic in lives lost to overdoses, now comes health authorities’ warning of a potential HIV outbreak because of Pennsylvania’s sparse needle-exchange programs — which are illegal in the state — and the limited availability of needles, which under state law are considered to be drug paraphernalia. The human immunodeficiency virus, spread by sharing needles or using dirty ones, can lead to AIDS. Health experts estimate that a Pennsylvania HIV outbreak, as witnessed in other states, could cost the commonwealth millions of dollars and are urging Gov. Tom Wolf to decriminalize syringe and needle exchanges. Their argument is compelling.

“We write now to strongly support the use of this declaration to immediately expand Syringe Service Programs … in Pennsylvania. Such programs are community-based programs that provide access to sterile needles and syringes free of cost and facilitate safe disposal of used needles and syringes.”

Letter signed by public health representatives from the University of Pittsburgh, Drexel, Penn State, Temple, Thomas Jefferson University and the University of Pennsylvania

“In cities where we have needle exchanges, we’ve kept new HIV cases low.”

Alice Bell

Director of Prevention Point Pittsburgh

“My fear is that there’s going to be this huge upswing in cases that are not diagnosed initially, as we all know (intravenous drug) users are a population that’s very hard to reach, very hard to permeate and very hard to educate. They’re not the ones coming in the door to get tested.”

Bridget Calhoun

Duquesne University professor specializing in infectious diseases

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.