ShareThis Page
Reject Wall Street, pick Janet Yellen |
Featured Commentary

Reject Wall Street, pick Janet Yellen

| Saturday, September 28, 2013 9:00 p.m

Wall Street is used to getting its way in Washington. But for once it has been dealt a rebuff. The question now is whether President Barack Obama has received the message as he seeks a new chairman for the Federal Reserve.

Just a month ago, the president was stumping the heartland as champion of the middle class. But lately, he seems to have lost his way. His plan to nominate former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers as Fed chairman would have hurt the middle class and rewarded the financial elite by renewing Wall Street’s domination of U.S. financial policies.

The president was saved by Senate Democrats. Some, like Jeff Merkley of Oregon, objected vociferously to Summers, now a multimillionaire Wall Street consultant. “I have serious doubts that Mr. Summers, who as a committed deregulator drove policies that set the stage for the Great Recession, is the right person for a key regulator position,” Merkley warned the White House.

When Obama’s lieutenants took further soundings, they ran into stiff resistance from five Democrats on the Senate Banking Committee who had vivid memories of how Summers had favored bank deregulation prior to the financial blowup of 2008. Summers, fearing an acrimonious fight, took his name out of contention.

That throws the problem back to President Obama.

So far, he has strangely shied away from picking Janet Yellen, former head of the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank and now vice chairwoman of the Fed, to replace Ben Bernanke when he retires soon.

To many, Yellen seems a natural choice — well qualified as a former UC Berkeley economics professor, presidential economics adviser and policy ally of Bernanke. Like Bernanke, Yellen has defied the big banks, favoring new regulations, brushing aside Wall Street’s fears of inflation and trying to generate jobs and stimulate the economy.

Another putative Obama choice is Donald Kohn, a retired veteran Fed official, who advised both Bernanke and former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan.

By now, the president should understand that if he is going to protect the country from the power and risky trading of the mega-banks, he has to break Wall Street’s grip on government.

But that’s tough to do.

For two decades, Wall Street has so completely captured political Washington that former IMF economist Simon Johnson called it “the silent coup.” So many bankers flooded into high policy posts in the George W. Bush administration during the financial crisis, with former Goldman Sachs CEO Henry Paulson as Treasury secretary, that The New York Times headlined one story “Government Sachs.”

History should be telling Obama that he cannot afford to put another Wall Street favorite in charge of the Fed.

The track record of five administrations, Democrat as well as Republican, clearly points to the danger of putting Wall Street’s friends in command of the nation’s financial policies. The history lesson is that the president needs to look outside the Wall Street-Washington power grid for the next person to head the Fed.

Hedrick Smith is former Washington Bureau chief of The New York Times and author of the book “Who Stole the American Dream?”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.