ShareThis Page
S.E. Cupp: Oval Office reality show embarassing |
Featured Commentary

S.E. Cupp: Oval Office reality show embarassing

| Saturday, December 15, 2018 8:03 p.m.
The Washington Post
President Donald Trump debates with Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer as Vice President Mike Pence listens during a meeting in the Oval Office Dec. 11.

There was a time I might have been a little embarrassed to admit this: I’m a huge reality television fan.

You simply will not find a more committed consumer of the genre, from “Real Housewives” to “Hollywood Medium,” “Southern Charm” to “Below Deck.” After a long day of covering the actual news, there’s nothing better than crawling into bed to watch Dorinda scream “Jovani!” during Luann’s cabaret act as revenge for not putting her dry-cleaner boyfriend on the guest list. (Those who know, know.)

I’ve said many a time — with a straight face — that “Vanderpump Rules” is without question the best show on television, as no other delivers the pathos, ethos and catharsis in a single hour that it does. Not “Narcos,” not “Billions,” not even “Game of Thrones.” I’ll take Stassi over Daenerys any day.

Now, Voltaire, Proust and Twain it is not. But, reality TV is the ultimate escape.

That said, there’s little about that world that should cross over into the real one.

Where reality TV relies on the pettiest of dramas, stokes the uncontrolled chaos of a wildfire, wreaks untold havoc on friendships, relationships and families, and exposes our often narcissistic, materialistic and celebrity-obsessed culture, real life — especially politics, where decisions that real lives depend upon are made — should veer far away from all of that.

And yet, a meeting in the Oval Office between President Trump, Vice President Mike Pence, Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer and soon-to-be House speaker Nancy Pelosi performed in front of television cameras for the world to watch in real time is quickly drawing reality-television comparisons.

The jaw-dropping meeting was a poorly produced reality show, complete with the catfights, stare-downs, snarky one-liners, posing and preening that comes with them.

For some it was just the sugar rush they needed. Many political commentators decided the spectacle was entertaining and even funny, demanding it “play on a loop” so they can watch it with popcorn. On “Fox & Friends,” Brian Kilmeade insisted, “if you are in that pool spray, you are loving this, and if you are an American citizen you are loving this.”

It made for perfect late-night fodder, and surely “Saturday Night Live” will have a field day with it this weekend.

But, there was nothing funny about it. In fact, this new genre is deeply disturbing and even kind of sad.

Here were four of the nation’s top political leaders bickering publicly over what should be important legislation. Trump used the cameras to look tough. Schumer and Pelosi — who repeatedly urged the group to negotiate behind closed doors — used the moment to show Trump they held the cards now.

Pence was there to be the loyal but ultimately useless best friend who probably won’t make the second-season cut because he just isn’t good television.

But, who was there to actually govern? Not pretend govern, for the cameras, but actually legislate? The dominant argument (or “story line,” as they say in reality television) between Trump and Pelosi was over process: whether the House should bother voting on a border wall if it can’t pass the Senate.

It might have been emotionally gratifying for Trump supporters and critics alike who could cheer on their favorite character and root against their enemies, but in the end, nothing that impacts American lives actually came of it.

The Trump reality show’s first season is just over halfway through. It’s entertaining, yes. There’s drama every damn day. Sometimes it’s even funny. But, if the Tuesday meeting was a sneak peek at what’s to come in the season’s second half, it might just mean a total breakdown of the American political process.

And that kind of reality isn’t an escape at all.

S.E. Cupp is the host of ”S.E. Cupp Unfiltered” on HLN.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.