ShareThis Page
S.E. Cupp: Reasons Trump might not run in 2020 |
Featured Commentary

S.E. Cupp: Reasons Trump might not run in 2020

The Tribune-Review
| Tuesday, November 20, 2018 8:03 p.m
Sean Stipp | Tribune-Review
President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump.

About six months ago, a friend and I were talking about the 2020 presidential elections when he shared a startling prediction: President Trump would not seek re-election.

Despite the fact that my friend is politically connected, brilliant and often right when others are wrong, I thought, “no way, no how.” Trump’s ego is too bloated for him to simply walk away from the most powerful post on the planet. And by all accounts, he’s masterfully redefined the office to suit all his self-centered needs.

He works only when he wants to, reportedly dedicating as few as three hours a day to governing and devoting the rest to “executive time,” or watching television and tweeting.

He skips the traditional obligations most presidents have fulfilled, from holding regular press conferences to honoring our veterans at Arlington National Cemetery on Veterans Day. If it’s not important to him, conventions be damned.

And he’s managed to bend the will of Republicans in Congress to his version of politics, which often looks nothing like theirs, getting easy cover for bad policies like tariffs or a trillion-dollar spending bill, as well as for his near-constant perversion of conservative values.

Why on earth would he leave all this behind?

I’m now beginning to understand what my friend was imagining when he said Trump wouldn’t run again. And I think he may be right. Here’s why.

He’s running
out of stooges

Life was easy when Trump’s inner circle was happy to protect him from outside pressures. Republicans shielded him from investigations, and his aides carried out his imprudent ideas. But that’s all falling apart.

In a Hail Mary attempt to keep the Robert Mueller investigation at bay, he’s appointed Matthew Whitaker to head up the Justice Department. But that is, even by Trump’s own admission, temporary. No one person can keep the investigation from running its course. Democrats will see to that, and then some.

He trusts no one

He’s reportedly preparing to fire Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen and Chief of Staff John Kelly , and First Lady Melania Trump issued her own unusual call for deputy national security adviser Mira Ricardel to be fired . As Washington Post White House bureau chief Philip Rucker suggested, “There are not particularly the sort of close loyal friends that he feels he can confide in with any regularity at a deep emotional level.”

The castle is crumbling from the inside, and Trump is feeling like a ruler under siege.

His base is shrinking

The midterm elections proved one thing: Trump’s base is not as big as it once was. He’s lost a considerable contingent in the suburbs, and he will not likely have the turnout he did in 2016 by 2020. Nor will he have as singularly horrible an opponent.

It’s not ego
that drives him

It’s easy to assume that ego is Trump’s main motivator. But it’s actually his irrational, impulsive, insatiable id — the dominant part of his brain that craves immediate gratification and self-soothing affirmation at all times. He wants what he wants when he wants it. As he gets less of what he wants, and has fewer people willing to bend the rules to help him get it, it’s quite easy to imagine Trump impulsively deciding someday in the next year or so that he’s had enough.

The 2020 elections are light years away by political standards. We know Trump’s biggest brand is never running away from a fight, and in the end that might trump everything. Anything can happen — but little of that is likely to favor the president.

The next few months will be bloody and exhausting for all of us, but for the president they might just be too much to take.

S.E. Cupp is the host of “S.E. Cupp Unfiltered” on HLN. Readers may email her at .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.