Saturday essay: A familiar voice |
Featured Commentary

Saturday essay: A familiar voice

Halloween’s passing broke open the floodgates of Christmas that, once upon a midnight clear, none dared breach until Santa Claus brought up the rear of the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade.

And while we all can pine for the “good old days” of Christmastime being a limited run, it is nonetheless refreshing to be able to think out loud, without a rotten-pumpkin pummeling, about how to decorate the house for Christmas.

After all, most private “light-up nights” come not long after the dogs have dragged the turkey carcass through the house after someone forgot to put up the gate between the kitchen and dining room. That leaves a mere three weeks to plan.

Abode McNickle will have a different look this Christmas, given the rehabilitated porch with no railing, a new trellis and a different color scheme. And sans any ornery decision to build that long-threatened mechanical waving Jesus with “Keep Christ in Christmas” in neon above it, the outdoor decor, perhaps shocking the neighbors, will be tasteful.

There will be lots of greenery, of course; the colored lights will be small and subdued, as per usual. But replacing the plastic blow mold snowman and penguin will be two sweet carolers (circa 1960) standing on either side of a street lamp.

And, listening very carefully, surely the minds of passers-by will hear a familiar voice — their own — singing in some long-ago Christmas pageant.

— Colin McNickle

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.