U.N. anti-torture panel’s psychodrama |
Featured Commentary

U.N. anti-torture panel’s psychodrama

The United Nations Committee Against Torture will soon hear testimony in New York City on whether gay conversion therapy, recently outlawed in California and New Jersey, is “a form of torture.” The panel began hearings in Geneva, Switzerland.

“The time is long overdue for the United States to address the severe harms inflicted on young LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) people and their families by purveyors of these dangerous and discredited practices,” National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR) attorney Samantha Ames told The Washington Times.

Ms. Ames runs the NCLR’s “#BornPerfect” campaign. It strongly opposes any efforts to change sexual orientation, which it claims is set at birth. The NCLR has been lobbying the U.N. for help in outlawing any psychiatric or therapeutic effort to convert young homosexuals to heterosexuality, even if they specifically ask for such professional help. Ames advocates that American states prohibit state-licensed psychologists, psychiatrists or other mental-health professionals from attempting to change a minor’s sexual orientation or self-identified gender.

Many groups that favor conversion therapy for young Americans have “supported laws in other countries criminalizing LGBT people, such as the ‘kill the gays’ bill recently in Uganda,” Ames told The Times. Austin Ruse of the Center for Family & Human Rights Institute said the idea that conversion therapy is torture is “absurd.” He added that the U.N. Committee Against Torture — despite member nations with problematic human-rights records — is likely to be sympathetic to the NCLR, though the psychiatric profession generally believes that people with “unwanted” conditions, which can include homosexual attractions, deserve a therapeutic response.

Since this psychodrama will soon play out in Manhattan, an idea flashed to me: Invite New York’s lunatic mayor, Bill de Blasio, and his wife, Chirlane McCray, to testify. A 54-year-old former lesbian and charter member of a black feminist collective, she says she “renounced” lesbianism after she met her husband, then a Sandinista supporter (perhaps the conversion occurred on their honeymoon on their beloved island of Cuba). Dare I say that de Blasio, under laws passed at the NCLR’s behest, would have been banned from serving as the catalyst for his wife’s switch to heterosexuality? Perhaps he would have been jailed or at least fined.

To add to the circus act, the parents of Michael Brown — the “gentle giant” slain in a confrontation with a Ferguson, Mo., police officer that has been heavily politicized by the attorney general and President Obama — are soliciting funds to travel to Geneva to testify. Don’t be surprised if Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, America’s Frick and Frack, show up with them.

Richard W. Carlson is a former U.S. ambassador to the Seychelles and the former director of the Voice of America.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.